📖 Notes LESSON 11 OF 20

Task 2 — Argument Essay Band 7 Structure

⏱️ 30 min
✍️ Writing

The Essay That's Worth Double

Task 2 carries twice the weight of Task 1, and a clear four-paragraph argument structure with real examples consistently outperforms flashier but less organised writing.

40 Minutes, Worth Double

40
Minutes recommended
250
Minimum word count
Weight vs Task 1
4
Paragraphs in the structure

The 4-Paragraph Structure

1
Introduction
Paraphrase the topic, then state your thesis/position clearly.
2
Body 1 — main argument
Topic sentence → explanation → example → link back to the thesis.
3
Body 2 — second argument
Same four-part structure, different supporting point.
4
Conclusion
Restate your position and summarise the two arguments.

Time Plan (40 minutes)

⏳ Recommended split
Plan
5 min
5
Write
30 min
30
Review
5 min
5

Avoid These

  • Contractions — write "do not", not "don't"
  • Bullet points — Task 2 must be full prose paragraphs
  • Short paragraphs (fewer than 4 sentences)
  • Repeating the same vocabulary throughout the essay
⚠️
Planning isn't optional time
Skipping the 5-minute plan to "save time" is the most common reason essays lose Coherence & Cohesion marks — an unplanned essay tends to drift off-topic by the second body paragraph.

Full Model Essay — Band 7–8

The 4-paragraph structure above applied to a real Task 2 prompt, with a breakdown of exactly why it scores well.

Prompt: Some people believe that technology has made people less social. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that modern technology, particularly smartphones and social media, has weakened face-to-face social connections. While I understand this concern, I believe technology has changed the nature of social interaction rather than reduced it overall.

On one hand, there is clear evidence that heavy device use can displace in-person contact. It is a common sight to see friends or family members sitting together yet absorbed in their individual phones instead of talking to one another. Over time, this habit can weaken the depth of real-world relationships, since quick messages rarely replace the nuance of a face-to-face conversation. Critics of technology often point to this pattern as proof that people are becoming more isolated.

On the other hand, technology has also created entirely new forms of social connection that would not otherwise exist. Video calls allow families separated by distance to maintain close relationships, while online communities connect people who share niche interests they could never have found locally. For many, particularly those with limited mobility or social anxiety, digital platforms offer a genuine and valuable way to socialise that traditional settings do not provide. In this sense, technology has broadened, rather than narrowed, who people are able to connect with.

In conclusion, while excessive or thoughtless use of technology can reduce the quality of in-person interaction, it would be inaccurate to say technology has made people less social overall. It has simply shifted where and how socialising happens, bringing both new risks and new opportunities.

Why this scores Band 7–8
Task Response: takes a clear, balanced position stated in the introduction and maintained through to the conclusion — never sits on the fence. Coherence & Cohesion: "On one hand" / "On the other hand" clearly signals the two-sided structure, and each paragraph opens with a topic sentence. Lexical Resource: topic-specific collocations ("weaken real-world relationships", "displace in-person contact", "broadened who people are able to connect with") instead of repeating "technology" and "social" mechanically. Grammatical Range: a mix of complex sentences (relative clauses, conditionals) and shorter ones for emphasis, with no repeated grammar patterns. At 268 words with four full paragraphs, it comfortably clears the 250-word minimum.
🗒 Cheat Sheet 📝 Worksheet